GoDaddy Response to Domain Deletion
Wow – I Almost Stuck My Foot In My Mouth!
I was reading a story over at Domainnamewire.com where GoDaddy took back a domain because there was an invalid email registered showing on Whois for the owner of FamilyAlbum.com. Predictably, the story goes that after GoDaddy sent an email to the invalid address asking for a corrected email, it bounced and after 10 days, they either took the domain back or deleted it and a person who had backordered the domain received it.
Now, let me disclose up front that GoDaddy hosts all of my active domains and I have personally never had anything but positive experiences with them.
However, I’m only one person, and there are a lot of folks who are using the article above to share various GoDaddy horror stories and even though I have not shared any of these “bad” experiences, after reading the story from Domainnamewire.com it was enough for me to consider moving all of my domains away from them – As far as I’m concerned this is “sacred ground” type stuff. The ethics of your domain hosting service must be above reproach!
Myth and Motivation
But then, I thought… the internet is full of folks who have alternative motivations and there are plenty of “myth” emails and stories out there. So, I thought I would check up on this story with the folks at GoDaddy. I called their New Domain Sales Department and told the representative that I was thinking about transferring a domain over to have them host it (which is true, by the way… I have a parked domain with another company which I am either going to auction off or transfer to a different hosting company).
I did not tell them that they already hosted a lot of my other domains. I told them that I was very concerned about the article that I had just read, but that I had heard good things about them and their prices were extremely attractive, so I wanted to get more information about this story.
The GoDaddy representative put me on hold after I described the situation to him and about 3 minutes later he returned after speaking with his supervisor. Apparently, the supervisor had been a trainer at the time this situation occurred 1 – 2 years ago. The article referred to above shows a letter which appears to be from GoDaddy Domain Services and puts the date 12/19/2006 on the incident. I do not know if these are the same or different situations, as I do not know the sources of the other article.
What Happened According To GoDaddy
The GoDaddy representative relayed the following to me:

The party who had the domain backordered had met the owner of the domain previously and had found out that the email was invalid and that the owner was going to be out of town for a couple of weeks. So, they placed a back order and sent a complaint that the email was invalid to GoDaddy. GoDaddy then sent an email AND called the phone number they had on file for the owner where they left him a voicemail. When he did not respond in 10 days, per ICANN rules and regulations they were required to delete the account.
When the account became available, the person who had placed the backorder received the domain.
Upon the original owner’s return from his trip, he received the voicemail and contacted GoDaddy who advised him to contact the other party to see if they would release the domain back, which the new owner did not agree to do. What followed was a dispute between GoDaddy, ICANN, the original owner and the guy who backordered the domain.
Anything Official?
I asked if the rep knew of an official statement that had been issued by GoDaddy that I could look at which would summarize the issue, but he said that if there was one, he did not know where it would be.
I checked Bob Parson’s blog and didn’t find anything there, but to be honest, I did not crawl back through every post for the past 3 years.
The representative also pointed me to the following link which describes their Platinum package which is designed to prevent this type of thing from occurring. If you hover your mouse of the green question marks next to Expiration Protection and Deadbolt Transfer Protection, you will see that for $24.99 a domain can be protected for up to a year from a malicious transfer.
In my opinion, if you have a major domain name an additional $24.99 is well worth the protection the GoDaddy Platinum package provides.
MY OPINION - Follow The Money
Consider the modern Las Vegas casino, as romantic as it may seem to blame the house’s ability to win because they cheat, (and even though it may make it easier to explain the loss of money to your wife) it does not make any financial sense to the casino to risk their entire operation so they can win a couple of extra blackjack hands.
The same goes for GoDaddy. Why would they risk their entire customer base and violate ICANN regulations for the sake of taking back a single domain, or for that matter 1,000 domains? There is no way, in my opinion, that GoDaddy would promote or condone this type of action. Sure, mistakes can happen, but as far as this being some sort of conspiracy, not so much…
In fact, it appears that they have designed specific systems and processes to prevent this type of issue from happening. If they did allow these sorts of transfers to occur they would be out of business in a heartbeat – and there is no risk/reward that would justify these sorts of actions.
Now, I do not know the folks at Domainnamewire.com - in fact, the tone of their articles seem to be fair, but, they do have hosting links all over their site, so if they scare people away from GoDaddy, who really gains?
Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comments (8) or Leave A Trackback.
Post Info
This entry was posted on Saturday, March 3rd, 2007 and is filed under Registration & Hosting.Tagged with: .You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments Feed. You can Leave A Comment, or A Trackback.
Previous Post: What Happened To Tatman??? »
Next Post: And He Thought… Updates »
- Why Kill The Electric Car
- Homemade Electric Car
- Checkmate Prediction - McCain Mis-step and Democrat Selfishness
- T. Boone Pickens Courtesy of the Auto Channel
- Anthony Robbins At TEDTalks - Feb 2006
- AIG Rescue at Hand: Government to Take 80% Stake in Exchange for $85 Billion
- Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog
- NBC Refusing To Run Pickens Ad
- T. Boone Pickens Is Full Of Crude
- Christian The Lion








March 3rd, 2007 23:10
It is a good reminder that people should make sure their email addresses are up to date on the domain names.
March 4th, 2007 01:24
Yeah - you are not kidding there
March 4th, 2007 02:05
Nice perspective Mark.
I happen to think that regardless of the situation, GoDaddy moved way too fast. They also appear to be suggesting that the new owner is nothing short of a ground gliding rattlesnake.
In situations like this I like to believe in the concept of Karma. Lets hope that this ass gets his just rewards and that GoDaddy tighten up procedures to ensure it never happens again.
Personally, I wouldn’t use them in a month of sunny Sundays.
March 4th, 2007 05:54
>When he did not respond in 10 days, per ICANN rules and regulations they were required to delete the account.
Hi Mark,
I’m afraid what GoDaddy told here wasn’t exactly true. They do *not* mandate that the Registrar/Reseller deletes the domain if the WHOIS information is incorrect. In fact Tucows, choose to suspend the domain for the duration of the registration period. They would then only sell it onto a new customer after 80 days (40 days is the usual redemption period before domains are released into the public pool again).
I have copied the relevent section of the ICANN rules for you to look at:
http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-03apr03.htm
Subsection 3.7.7.2 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement does not require a registrar to cancel a registration in the event a customer fails to respond within 15 days. The accreditation agreement’s approach of requiring the registrar to retain the right to cancel if the customer fails to respond in 15 days, but not requiring the registrar to exercise that right is intended to give the registrar the flexibility to use good judgment to determine what action should be taken upon a customer’s failure to respond to an inquiry about a Whois inaccuracy.
So you see here, ICANN do not demand cancellation in this rule, but they give the Registrar/Reseller the right to do it. What the Registrar/Reseller does in the event of inaccurate information was meant to be left to their ‘good judgment’. In GoDaddy’s case they choose to cancel the domain immediately and resell it to a third party - make of that what you will.
It’s important to realise that this ICANN regulation was originally intended to be used to stop online fraud and cyber-squatting. In these cases false WHOIS info prevented the authorities tracking them down. ICANN gave the Registrars/Resellers the right to cancel the domain to give them some extra teeth here to force these fraudsters to put in their correct information.
IMHO their intention was not to target legitimate web sites and owners.
Anyway, great blog - I’ve added you to my reading list
Take care!
March 4th, 2007 07:33
Hey, thanks for the comment. I don´t know what inspires such distrust in Godaddy, so far I´ve trusted them with more than a dosen names. Perhaps its that hyper oversell tactic. They really are boarderline sometimes, anyone who has some experience can see that sometimes they are almost trying to fool the customer. I was fooled f.eks. when I three times bought three names together because then I got free anonymousity, or so I thought. It was not untill I recomended godaddy because of this offer that I learned the anon registration is free only for a year. If I´m not careful it will effectively triple the price of my domain names on a yearly basis.
March 6th, 2007 10:09
Thanks for going the extra mile and calling GoDaddy. Unfortunately, I think the customer service rep gave a line of B.S. The situation they are referring to must have been another case. If you look up the Whois records on FamilyAlbum.com you can verify that this incident happened within the past couple months. Honestly, it adds more fuel to the fire that they told you this story.
March 6th, 2007 11:37
@Andrew - Yeah - I understand, but, as I mentioned in my post, these could be two separate issues.
The following is what I get from Internic Whois:
Domain Name: FAMILYALBUM.COM
Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: PARK35.SECURESERVER.NET
Name Server: PARK36.SECURESERVER.NET
Status: clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Updated Date: 05-feb-2007
Creation Date: 28-may-2002
Expiration Date: 28-may-2008
I am guessing you are looking at the Updated Date to determine the transfer?
March 13th, 2007 09:41
[…] other news related to this issue, I came across an article by someone who called GoDaddy support to inquire about the FamilyAlbum.com case: The GoDaddy […]